Get expert tax attorney help.Call (425) 338-0414

Tax Planning Services

Tailored next stepsCall within one business day

The Appointment That Should Have Happened in October

A lot of people leave a tax meeting in April wishing they had asked the same question six months earlier: what can we still do about this?

By that point, the answer is usually nothing.

Not because the situation was hopeless, but because the year was already over. The income was recorded. The structure was set. The contribution window had closed.

That is the difference between tax planning and tax preparation. One changes the number. The other confirms it.

Tax planning vs tax preparation
TAX PLANNING
Changes the number.
Happens while the year is open.
Entity, compensation, retirement.
TAX PREPARATION
Confirms the number.
Happens after the year closes.
By April, most options are gone.

October Decisions Cannot Be Made in April

A sole proprietor generating $140,000 in net profit has a real S-Corp election question sitting inside that number. Left unexamined, it costs somewhere between $8,000 and $12,000 in excess self-employment tax. Every year the structure stays unchanged.

The decision is not complicated once someone looks at it. The problem is that most owners never look until April, and by April the year has already answered it by default.

Retirement contributions, income deferral, deduction timing, quarterly estimate adjustments: none of those are year-end maneuvers. They are mid-year ones, available only while the calendar still has room.

Tax Planning Is Not a Year-End Conversation

The engagement starts with a review of the full income picture while the year is still open. Where the income is coming from, how it is classified, what the entity structure is actually costing.

Contractors running crews in Snohomish County, healthcare providers splitting time between a practice and a hospital, and tech workers with equity compensation sitting on top of a W-2: each of those situations has a different set of moves available. The review identifies which ones are still on the table.

For business owners and high earners, including those with equity compensation or complex income, tax planning for individuals at this level often centers on one combination: entity structure, owner compensation, and retirement funding. Together, those three represent the largest lever in the entire return.

Proactive tax planning addresses those levers while they can still move, before the year closes them off.

Situations that come up most often in a planning engagement:

  • Income timing and deferral across calendar years
  • S-Corp election review and owner compensation strategy
  • Retirement contribution planning and account selection
  • Capital gains management and investment income sequencing
  • Washington B&O tax classification review
  • Estimated payment recalibration mid-year
  • Multi-year carryforward and loss coordination
  • Entity restructuring before it becomes a taxable conversion

When several of these apply at once, the interactions between them matter as much as any individual item. Tax strategy services built around the full picture handle them as one engagement, not a checklist worked through in isolation.

What a General Financial Advisor Cannot Do

A financial advisor models projections. That is a different function than tracing a Washington B&O misclassification, restructuring owner compensation to reduce self-employment exposure, or responding to an IRS notice.

Those are accounting functions. They require CPA licensure and professional accountability for the analysis behind them.

At Maris, a tax planning consultant and the return preparer are the same person, working from the same records. What was reviewed in Q3 is what gets filed in February. No handoff, no reconciliation between separate advisors working toward the same deadline.

A tax planning CPA carries IRS representation authority. If the position gets questioned, we answer it.

The Year Has More Room in It Than April Suggests

Owners who have been filing without a planning layer often assume the gap between what they paid and what they could have paid is not large enough to justify a closer look. That assumption rarely survives contact with the actual numbers.

A first planning engagement frequently surfaces two or three decisions from prior years worth revisiting, not as errors but as context for what to do differently going forward. Knowing that going into the next year changes how decisions get made before April, not just what gets reported in it.

Most people who start a planning engagement describe the same thing afterward: April stopped feeling like a verdict. The bill was still real. It just stopped being a surprise.

Maris & Associates CPAs takes on planning work at any point in the year. If the year is still open, there is still time. Call us.